Cruising Past Seventy: The Inner Journeys: WOW: Experiencing Election Fever!

Monday, November 12, 2012

WOW: Experiencing Election Fever!

Carol at the Cottonwood , Arizona Post Office, addressing an express delivery envelope for her ballot
On Election Day, Nov. 6, 2012, I cast my vote by mail via guaranteed express mail delivery (Bill had already mailed his vote a week before) that will arrive at the King County Elections Office of Washington State two days after. It is my first time to vote after my naturalization February of last year. So this fever a different.
First Baptist Church, polling place in Cottonwood, Arizona

I served the Philippine government twice, as Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue in the late 1990s and as IT consultant to the Commission on Elections in the early 2000s, both for the automation of their systems. Therefore, while the buzz and hype was flaunted in traditional and alternative media, my brain was reeling with ‘what ifs’ for my home country.

Romney and Obama
So I felt compelled to write about my first direct experience of the US elections along two areas, process and culture. At 11:15 PM EST on Election Day, major broadcast stations called Ohio for Obama, and with that, his reelection. An hour later, Romney gave a gracious concession speech and thirty minutes later, Obama gave a rousing call for unity! How can a country of 312 M be able to agree on the results in such a short time after the polls close (actually just an hour after those in the Pacific time zone, with Hawaii and Alaska polls still open)? It was truly amazing to see and rather inspiring to watch!

The Electoral Process: Convenience

the ballot and the guide
Process is key to this phenomenon. Articles One and Two of the US Constitution and various amendments lay the foundation for the American electoral process. It is more by the state (who delegates to counties things such a technologies and processes) rather than by the federal government. The latter regulates presidential campaign finance which involves public funds.

It is estimated that there are about one million positions filled every election period. My ballot is only one page, back-to-back, because it is designed at the county level. So it contains very few federal (3) and state (8) positions. I was asked if I wanted to register as a voter when I first applied for a drivers’ license in the county where I was residing, King County in Washington. The county delivered to each voter an Election Guide (also available on the Net). I used it extensively for it had discussions of the state measures being asked (same-sex marriage, legalization of marijuana, etc.) for approval and the resumes of the candidates for each position.

Same-Sex Marriage passed in Washington
along with 2 others, making  it a total of 9 states
marijuana is now legalized in 18 states
At the polling place we visited in Cottonwood, Arizona, voters had the choice of voting manually (OCR) or electronically (voting machines). Once identification is validated (signature-checking machines vs a drivers’ license, a student ID, a work ID, etc.) and an online check with a county voter data base), his ballot is printed or made available on a screen. Very few provisional ballots are preprinted for emergency cases.  As soon as the poll is closed, the ballots are counted; the polling place (church, library, fire station, or school) sends their data to the county which holds all of them (including the paper ballots and other control papers) and sends summary data to the state. And it is the Secretary of State of any state, an elected position that is accountable to the People, who releases official poll results.
one type of voting machines in the US
ballot drop box

The key trend is to provide convenient access to as much of the electorate as possible. It was not too long ago when there was only one day for elections, the second Tuesday of November, which was not even a holiday, and everything was entirely manual. Today it is estimated that 30% do absentee and early voting. Although some states define these to be the traditional like attesting to being away on voting day (absentee) or not being able to vote during polling hours due to work shifts (early), there are those like Washington and Oregon which mail ballots to 100% of those registered. As a matter of fact, ballot drop boxes have become popular there. But there is still great controversy about all these new processes. Please see http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Early-voting-a-trend-but-does-it-diminish-4026673.php.

Culture of Elections: Trust

Electoral College System
Such an open process can be very difficult to control and safeguard thus unacceptable in countries like the Philippines. This gets us to a discussion of the culture of elections. I have often been so amazed that Bill or I would leave a camera or a bag in a retail store or items of apparel at the community center and come back to find it with the Supervisor or right where we left it! I feel that voter fraud (although there were cries about it throughout Election Day+1 and seven House positions still remain unresolved) constitute small, sporadic, isolated incidents in a country that has developed for almost a quarter of a millennium. The electorate, the electoral administrators, and the candidates through their parties have achieved electoral grace by its trust for the Electoral College system that has been used for the past 238 years and the people who have evolved to cherish first and foremost the stability of the Union. Please see the history of presidential elections here: http://www.history.com/topics/presidential-elections.

King County Board of Elections
The other thing that continues to amaze me is that, though there seems to be a melting pot, an assimilationist culture that embraces the country, its demographics is still so diverse and constantly shifting. Romney won the over 45 years old, the whites, the men. Obama won the less than 45 years old, the Hispanics, Afro-Americans, Asian-Americans and other minorities, the women, and the LGBT. Microtargeting each demographic segment is truly a must. When I was teaching ‘Diversity Issues in Business’ at the Seattle Community College in 2007-08, I asked all my students to visualize business in the year 2050 (when the current minority will be the majority) at once because it certainly will not come in a second.

Philippine ballot boxes
My fever brought me all the way back to thoughts for my home country for whom I will never cease to want to help. It is representative of other struggling democracies in the world. The Philippines may not be as large in area or population, not as culturally diverse, and not have the same form of government as the US (binary with federal and state vs unitary, federal only) but it is more densely populated than any state in America. And it is also very young (66 years, if reckoned from US-granted independence, or 114, if from the defeat of the Spanish) Thus the design of the electoral process is still complex. It would be interesting to see which one (or any combination) of the 50 states’ models can be the most beneficial.
   
voting machines in the Philippines
Can the Philippine electoral process have the same convenience for the electorate and trust by every participant? I believe trust must precede convenience. So the first question to ask is: can election administration be accountable to the people by making its positions elective and professional, not appointive and partisan?  Can it be decentralized at some pragmatic level? Can it be made more accessible and convenient without the perception of losing control? Can the national government be open to needed changes? The technology for any scenario is already available. It is not the issue. Culture is. And maybe economy is. So now may be the time. And maybe that is what is happening now, continuing the effort to build trust.
trust in government is now very high and the economy is at a high
with the election of Benigno Aquino, Jr. in 2010

14 comments:

  1. A high quality camera for a verу attrаctive ρrice or ϳust a bad quality pіcture?
    Discoνеr оn thе full review at http://reviews.
    tοp-information.net/canon-pоwershot-sx50-hs-rеviеw/
    Here is my web blog - small motorhomes

    ReplyDelete
  2. I look at it from a culture of want. Physiological (food, water, homeostasis, sleep) and safety needs (security of body, employment, resources, health) - of Maslow's - that are not satisfied that brings about this culture of want. There is still widespread poverty in the country that people cannot move up to working on actualizing higher needs. People are always on the lookout for opportunities to fulfill these basic needs; thus vote selling is very much a reality. Anything that is set up out there to facilitate easy and convenient voting that are not secure and are open - machines, drop boxes, etc - will be stolen and sold for a buck for the family's next meal.

    And those who have actually transcended the basic and safety needs level have come up but have not successfully whisked off the scarcity mentality. The culture of want still clings to them. They still don't think principles and values and they take advantage of the common tao's urgent life-giving needs as a means of say, getting elected.

    And those who are on the highest level of Maslow's hierarchy of needs is such a small number, they cannot influence the masses to even start thinking about trust.

    As country we have a long way to go to address the culture of want. Quantum paradigm shifting towards abundance mentality is needed. The good news is Pres. Aquino may have started it but six years maybe so little that they will not penetrate where it matters most.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is why I said the economy may be the issue. But if the Philippines is now getting stronger economically, some progress will happen. 238 vs 66 years. It will happen. Just not in our time, maybe!

      Delete
  3. Nini and I had the chance to work with COMELEC via a UNDP Project in 2002. We mapped the then existing manual processes of the election (both local and national). It was s good study for the inception of computerization. What struck me as a key component of any computerization is the integrity and accuracy of the voters' list. The other key component is the integrity of the process of identifying the voter and recognizing the vote that he/she casts.

    If the citizens know and believe that COMELEC's list is correct and complete, they will trust that voters will be properly identified and their votes will be counted.

    Technology has allowed the processes of counting and transmitting the results of canvass to be speedy. When citizens trust these processes, they know that the results, when announced, are trustworthy and correct.

    I do not doubt that Pinoys will trust our election process, especially when we become fully automated (only counting and transmission were computerized the last time). We have learned to trust the ATMs. We have learned to trust pre-paid mobile phones, 'pasa-load', Smart Money, and 'Pera-padala' with the hard-earned OFW jobs. So, for a fully computerized elections, I do not doubt that Pinoys can even go to mobile voting...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Registration was the bent of the computerization thrust when i was a consultant to them. We felt that if the voters data base is wrong, then making the counting speedy will only speed up the announcement of not the real winners. And since it was being pushed by the commissioner that a sector did not really trust, it had a terrible time going through. D don't know how good the data base is now. Is anybody working on it? Was the previous project completed?

      Delete
  4. ...

    thank you for inviting us to comment on your blog regarding your first voting experience in the last U.S. elections. I have no doubt in the "technical aspect" of their recent polls. the mere fact that Romney waited only a couple of hours (after the closing of polls in the contested states) to concede indicates that U.S. polls are indeed trusted and "technologically" worthy.

    however, when we look at any system, we have been trained to look at them from five (5) different aspects, and these are as follows: the financial, legal, socio/political, religious and the technical points of view towards the success of the exercise.

    being an outsider, obviously, i cannot make a position on either side of the political issue; in short, i'm neither a republican nor a democrat when it comes to this matter. but as a christian, i may be able to share an opinion on a "human dignity" perspective. after reading a number of history books and articles about American politics and elections, both have not been all that "fine and dandy;" ...but by the act of voting, many major issues confronting the nation are resolved, at the very least, temporarily.

    ...to summarize my view, let me share with you an article which was written about voting in America with somewhat the same observation. Here's the article below:

    Campaign 2012: What Voting Means, by George Weigel ~ First Things

    http://bit.ly/XWPVTA

    Thank you again, Colborns, for sharing your experiences; the bandwidth and the latitude...

    :-) (y)

    ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks for sharing that article. The Catholic vote in America in 2012, as before, was a bell weather of the popular vote. The Church urged for prudence before Election Day and urged for sobriety after. I voted about 50/50 Republican/Democrat, taking about 2 days to fill my ballot using a lot of research on the computer together with the Guide. My vote was a precious thing for me. An article I cited in my blog had a short history of 4 ages of American politics. I have also read creative fiction narratives of the Adams-Jefferson years. So the moral dimension is the same but I do like the convenience aspect of today and the trust aspect that favors the solidarity of the Union.

      Delete
  5. From the early days of this nation, people have elected others to represent them in selecting a new leader. That is the origin of the electoral system. As population grew, the systems improved and the system was refined. Today the desire to provide ease of access to voting is also providing even more opportunity for voter fraud and for buying votes from those less interested because it is too easy to cast ballots without adequate proof of who is casting that ballot. The changing demographics will certainly alter the shape of the electorate. As more people rely on government, then the more pervasive the government and the more people vote for whomever will give them the most. Not a good formula.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just wonder if there is more opportunity for voter fraud in nations with less refined systems and worse economic situations thereby fostering a 'culture of want' as my friend Ann says. But I agree that there is a delicate balance to tread on the size of government and issues that divide the nation. Finding that balance would be the best formula.

      Delete
  6. It's awesome to pay a quick visit this website and reading the views of all friends on the topic of this post, while I am also zealous of getting familiarity.
    my web site :: relationships expert

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mr. Anonymous! It might interest you to know that Bill and I met on the Net!

      Delete
  7. the difference:
    the american justice system is swift and effective. voters won't dare cheat
    nor sell their votes.
    although their controls are weak and easy to manipulate, it is not worth the risk.
    the public convenience you experienced in u.s. will not work in r.p. since you are
    not certain if it will be counted. you can provide as many audit trail you
    can think of, still the recount or protest procedure is simply full of bureaucratic
    delays and very expensive.


    our justice system is weak. to get someone to jail will be a miracle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, there are a lot of differences and, as i stated in the post, the philippines as a country is still young but we can aspire to have the same convenience and trust in the electoral process in the future. they are goals to redesign bureaucratic processes around.

      Delete

Leave a Comment